How Your Doctor’s Apology Can Affect Your Medical Malpractice Case
In Washington, D.C., the impact of a doctor’s apology on a medical malpractice claim can depend on specific legal provisions and the nature of the apology.
Washington, D.C. has laws in place that address the use of apologies in medical malpractice cases. According to Washington D.C. law, statements or gestures made by a healthcare provider to a patient (or the patient’s family) that express apology, sympathy, or a general sense of benevolence are generally not admissible as evidence of liability in a malpractice lawsuit. This means that an expression of sympathy or regret by your doctor cannot be used against them as evidence of negligence or fault in court.
Types of Apologies
The impact may also depend on the nature of the apology:
- Expressions of sympathy: A simple expression of sympathy like, “I’m sorry you are experiencing this” is covered under D.C.’s apology law and cannot be used to prove negligence.
- Admissions of fault: If the apology includes an admission of fault, e.g., “I’m sorry I made a mistake that caused your injury,” this could potentially be used as evidence in a malpractice claim. However, the distinction between a sympathetic statement and an admission of fault can sometimes be subtle and subject to legal interpretation.
Proving Negligence
Regardless of whether a doctor made an apology or not, a successful medical malpractice claim in Washington, D.C. requires demonstrating that the healthcare provider’s negligence caused harm. This typically involves:
- Establishing a duty of care owed by the provider to the patient. The primary way to establish a duty of care is by demonstrating the existence of a patient-provider relationship formed when the healthcare provider agreed to diagnose or treat a patient. This can be shown with medical records documenting a consultation between the provider and patient that results in a diagnosis or plan of treatment
- Showing a breach of that duty by deviating from the standard of care. Expert witnesses, typically other healthcare providers in the same field, can testify about what the standard of care should have been in your situation. Professional medical guidelines, protocols, consensus statements, relevant medical and studies can help define the standard of care.
- Proving that the breach directly caused the injury or harm. This element, known as establishing causation, involves demonstrating a direct link between the doctor’s deviation from the standard of care and the harm you suffered. Expert testimony, treatment records (including test results and treatment histories), and documentation of any communication between you and your provider is used to prove causation.
- Documenting the damages resulting from the injury. Medical bills, insurance statements, receipts, paystubs, and other damages are typically used to document an injury suffered as a result of medical malpractice. In addition, keeping thorough records of your damages and all interactions with your healthcare provider, including any apologies, will be valuable for your attorney in assessing and building your case.
What damages are available in a medical malpractice case?
You can seek several types of damages, which are generally categorized into compensatory damages (both economic and non-economic) and, in some cases, punitive damages. Here’s a breakdown of the damages available:
Economic Damages
These are quantifiable financial losses that you have incurred as a result of the malpractice. They might include:
● Past medical bills: Costs incurred for treatments, hospital stays, surgeries, medications, and other healthcare services.
● Future medical costs: Estimated costs for ongoing and future medical care, rehabilitation, and any necessary medical equipment.
● Past lost income: Wages lost from time off work due to your injury and treatments.
● Future lost earnings: Loss of earning capacity if you are unable to return to work or have to accept a lower-paying job due to your injury.
- Travel costs: Expenses for traveling to and from medical appointments.
- Home care and modifications: Costs for home health care or modifications to your home to accommodate your injury.
Non-Economic Damages
These are subjective, non-monetary losses suffered that can be more challenging to quantify but are equally important. They include:
● Pain and suffering: Physical pain and discomfort experienced as a result of the malpractice.
● Emotional distress: Psychological impact, such as anxiety, depression, and emotional trauma.
● Loss of enjoyment of life: Impact on your ability to enjoy daily activities, hobbies, and other aspects of life.
● Loss of consortium: Loss of companionship, affection, and sexual relationship with your spouse due to the injury.
Punitive Damages
Punitive damages are intended to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future. They are awarded in rare cases where the healthcare provider’s conduct was especially egregious or malicious. Although punitive damages are available in medical malpractice cases in Washington, D.C., they are not commonly awarded.
Special Damages
Special damages are a subcategory of compensatory damages and are specifically related to calculable out-of-pocket expenses. They include costs for services you can no longer perform yourself, such as housekeeping, childcare, and yard work.
Factors Affecting the Amount of Damages
Several factors can influence the amount of damages awarded in a medical malpractice case:
- Severity of the Injury: More severe and permanent injuries typically result in higher compensation.
- Impact on quality of life: The extent to which the injury has affected your daily life and future prospects.
- Age and health: Younger patients or those in good health prior to the malpractice may receive higher damages due to the longer impact on their lives.
- Documentation and evidence: The thoroughness of your documentation and the strength of your evidence can significantly impact the damages awarded.
In Washington, D.C., an apology from your doctor expressing sympathy cannot be used as evidence of liability, but an admission of fault could potentially impact your medical malpractice claim. Given the complexities involved, it’s essential to consult with a medical malpractice attorney knowledgeable about Washington, D.C. laws who can provide specific guidance on how an apology might impact your case and help you navigate the legal process.
At Paulson & Nace, PLLC, our attorneys represent clients throughout the District of Columbia in a wide range of medical malpractice cases. We have obtained millions of dollars for our clients, including the two largest medical malpractice verdicts in Washington, D.C. Call us or fill out our contact form to set up your free initial consultation today.
Samantha L. Peters, a lawyer specializing in medical malpractice and personal injury, joined Paulson & Nace, PLLC in 2022. She previously established a medical malpractice section at a Maryland firm. Licensed in Maryland and DC, she was listed in The National Trial Lawyers: Top 40 Under 40 and Top 100 Medical Malpractice Verdicts.